Presentations & Publications

Professional Presentations

• Redden, KK. (2006). Effective Witness Preparation: Avoiding the Nasty Sound-Bites. Texas Association of Defense Counsel, 2006 Fall Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana.
  
  
• Redden, K.K., et al. (2005). Presenting the company witness via videotape deposition – issues related to witness preparation, technology and video presentation. International Association of Defense Counsel, 2005 Annual Meeting, The Broadmoor, Colorado Springs, Colorado.
  
  
• Redden, K.K. , et al. (2005). Unsinking the ship: salvaging the case when the company representative is torpedoed in a video deposition. U.S. Law Transportation Seminar, Savannah, Georgia.
  
  
• Redden, K.K. (2004). A case for witness preparation. Brazoria County, Texas Bar Association. Angleton, Texas.
  
  
• Redden K.K. (2003). ABOTA masters in trial presentation. Weston Galleria. Houston, Texas.
  
  
• Kash, K. (2003). A case for witness preparation. Beck, Redden & Secrest, LLC. Houston, Texas.
  
  
• Kash, K. (2001). New directions in jury research. Baker, Sterchi, Cowden & Rice Firm Retreat. Lake of the Ozarks, Missouri.
  
  
• Jasa, K.K. (2000) Presentation and analysis of a product liability mock trial: The benefits of jury research. Reminger & Reminger Client Seminar, Columbus, Ohio.
  
  
• Jasa, K.K., Stallard, M.J. & Williams, R. (1999). Analysis of how a jury thinks: What to look for in a jury profile. Continuing Legal Education in Colorado, Inc., Denver Bar Association, Denver, CO.
  
  
• Jasa, K.K. & Williams, R. (1999). Analysis of how a jury thinks: What to look for in a jury profile. Continuing Legal Education Program, Sherman & Howard, Denver, Colorado.
  
  
• Jasa, K.K. (1999) Recognizing and managing juror heuristics. Medical Device Seminar, Hilton Head, North Carolina.
  
  
• Jasa, K.K. & Stallard, M.J. (1998). Exemplar mock trial & deliberation. American Bar Association. National Institute on Sexual Harassment: A Multi-Disciplinary View of the New Generation of Sexual Harassment Policies and Procedures and a Trial of a Sexual Harassment Case, Washington, D.C.
  
  
• Jasa, K.K. & Stallard, M.J. (1997). Through the looking glass: What the jury really sees. Trial Techniques for the Female Advocate: Kansas City Metropolitan Bar Association, Kansas City, MO.
  
  
• Jasa, K.K. & Stallard, M.J. (1997). Exemplar mock trial & deliberation. Section of Labor and Employment Law: American Bar Association, Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
  
  
• Rowland, C.K., Jasa, K.K. & Stallard, M.J. (1997). Trial Advocacy Program: Consideration on the use of an expert from the jurors’ perspective. Section of Labor and Employment Law: American Bar Association, Midwinter Meeting, Kiawah Island, S.C.

Publications

• Redden, K.K., (2006). Effective Deposition Preparation: Avoiding the Nasty Sound-bites®.
  
  
• Rowland, C.K, Jasa, K.K., & Stallard, M.J. (1998). Case formulations: Empirical estimation of key evidentiary ambiguities in sexual harassment litigation. In National Institute on Sexual Harassment: A Multi-Disciplinary View of the New Generation of Sexual Harassment Policies and Procedures and a Trial of Sexual Harassment (p. F5-9). Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.

Karen Kash Redden, formerly Karen Kash (Jasa)